January 14, 2020
Last Friday, the Dow peaked above 29,000 for a few minutes then scuttled below that level to close at 28,823.77. There’s something about new round numbers that seems daunting to Wall Street traders.
On Friday, January 14, 2000 – 20 years ago today – the Dow reached its bull market peak of 11,722.98. It did not see that level again until October 3, 2006, at 11,727.34 – about six years and nine months later.
The week of January 10-14, 2000 was a time of market euphoria. We had dodged the Y2K computer bug unscathed. Stocks were melting up. Even though the stodgy Dow was peaking, the S&P 500 kept rising and NASDAQ rose 16% in February alone, peaking at +20% through early March. Talk about a Melt-up!
On Monday, January 10, 2000, America Online agreed to pay $156.14 billion in stock for Time Warner, the biggest merger to date, and one that tied a leading Internet company with an old-line media giant. In a switcheroo of media dress codes, the suit-and-tie AOL CEO Steve Case controlled 55% of the venture, while the denim-clad Time-Warner CEO Gerald Levin controlled a minority 45%. The news sent NASDAQ up its biggest point gain to date, +167 points, while the Dow hit a record high of 11572.20.
The dotcom collapse lasted almost three years, to October 9, 2002. Then, the Dow doubled to a new high of 14,164.53 exactly five years later, October 9, 2007. It would not see those levels again until March 5, 2013, almost 5-1/2 years later. Since then, the Dow’s round numbers have come a little more rapidly:
- Dow 15,000 was pierced on May 7, 2013
- Dow 20,000 was breached on January 25, 2017
- Dow 25,000 was penetrated less than a year later, on January 4, 2018
Next stop: Dow 30,000 – perhaps by April? Then what?
A lot of commercial jets level out somewhere between 33,000 and 39,000 feet. Will the Dow level out at a similar plateau, or breach some sort of escape velocity and shoot for the stars? During the current bull market, the Dow has shot up from 6,547 on March 9, 2009 to nearly 29,000 now, a gain of some 340+% in nearly 11 years, but if you look at the last 40-year gains, the last 20 year’s gains are not so spectacular.
The Dow’s gain from 2000 to 2020 is less than +4.7% per year, annualized, which isn’t very much. By comparison, the Dow gained an average 14% a year from 1980 to 2000 (which included three recessions and a horrendous market crash in 1987). If the Dow had accelerated at the same rate from 2000 to 2020 as it had during the years 1980 to 2000, the Dow would now be at 155,900, so please don’t call Dow 30,000 or even 40,000 outrageously high. The first decade of the 21st century was the worst decade the market ever suffered, in real terms, so the 2010s can be considered something like a market “mulligan.”
The “Golden Spike of 1980” Revisited
This week also marks the 40th anniversary of the golden spike to $850 per ounce, when silver also reached $50, its all-time high in nominal terms. Gold reached its all-time high in real (after-inflation) terms, since $850 in 1980 dollars would be over $2,650 in today’s dollars. Silver was the driver in this case, due in part to inflation fears, but mostly from a cornering of the silver market by the Hunt brothers. It’s important to remember how brief this peak lasted. Gold was only over $800 for two days and it was only above $700 for five days. Silver was over $40 for only seven days. It was a classic spike in the metals.
Graphs are for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Please read important disclosures at the end of this commentary.
This chart is the very definition of a “spike.” Here are some of the key numbers in that spiky year:
A year before their price peaks, gold was under $217 and silver was under $6, so they gained 292% and 725%, respectively, in just one year. What’s more, they fell even faster in the following two months. Gold lost 42% and silver lost 72%, when the Hunt’s silver scheme unwound. As I wrote back in May 1980:
“Remember those thrilling days of yesterday – a cloud of dust, a thunder of hoofbeats, and a loan arranger saying, ‘I owe silver”? Actually, that was Bunker Hunt testifying on Capitol Hill. He claimed to have lost $750 million (some say $1.5 billion) in silver this year. That many bucks laid end to end would go around the world 7 times or pay for a slow day in the federal government. Bunker Hunt was making like a one-man Chrysler, asking for a billion-dollar loan.” –From “Alexander’s Monthly Economic Newsletter” (AMEN), May 1980
The lesson from this is (1) don’t try to corner commodity markets. A second lesson is (2) you should distrust anyone who tries to tell you that gold is a bad investment by comparing its current price to 1980. A key tenet of “lying with statistics” is a selective choice of starting dates. If you start in the year 2000, for instance, silver and gold have beaten stocks, but both starting points are unfair. Comparing gold to stocks is also unfair to begin with. Gold and silver should be compared to cash, not to stocks. Gold is a valid substitute for cash in a low interest-rate world, and gold has done very well over the last one year, five years, 20 years, 100 years and 5,000 years, so forget about comparisons to some spiky peak in 1980.
Gary Alexander has been Senior Writer at Navellier since 2009. He edits Navellier’s weekly Marketmail and writes a weekly Growth Mail column, in which he uses market history to support the case for growth stocks. For the previous 20 years before joining Navellier, he was Senior Executive Editor at InvestorPlace Media (formerly Phillips Publishing), where he worked with several leading investment analysts, including Louis Navellier (since 1997), helping launch Louis Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth and Global Growth newsletters.
Prior to that, Gary edited Wealth Magazine and Gold Newsletter and wrote various investment research reports for Jefferson Financial in New Orleans in the 1980s. He began his financial newsletter career with KCI Communications in 1980, where he served as consulting editor for Personal Finance newsletter while serving as general manager of KCI’s Alexandria House book division. Before that, he covered the economics beat for news magazines. All content of “Growth Mail” represents the opinion of Gary Alexander
Although information in these reports has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute Navellier’s judgment as of the date the report was created and are subject to change without notice. These reports are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned in these reports must take into account existing public information on such securities or any registered prospectus.To the extent permitted by law, neither Navellier & Associates, Inc., nor any of its affiliates, agents, or service providers assumes any liability or responsibility nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of any person acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this communication or for any decision based on it.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. The amount of a dividend payment, if any, can vary over time and issuers may reduce dividends paid on securities in the event of a recession or adverse event affecting a specific industry or issuer.
None of the stock information, data, and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Any specific securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The holdings identified do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients and the reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.
Information presented is general information that does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or needs, nor does it present a personalized recommendation to you. Individual stocks presented may not be suitable for every investor. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. Investment in fixed income securities has the potential for the investment return and principal value of an investment to fluctuate so that an investor’s holdings, when redeemed, may be worth less than their original cost.
One cannot invest directly in an index. Index is unmanaged and index performance does not reflect deduction of fees, expenses, or taxes. Presentation of Index data does not reflect a belief by Navellier that any stock index constitutes an investment alternative to any Navellier equity strategy or is necessarily comparable to such strategies. Among the most important differences between the Indices and Navellier strategies are that the Navellier equity strategies may (1) incur material management fees, (2) concentrate its investments in relatively few stocks, industries, or sectors, (3) have significantly greater trading activity and related costs, and (4) be significantly more or less volatile than the Indices.
ETF Risk: We may invest in exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and some of our investment strategies are generally fully invested in ETFs. Like traditional mutual funds, ETFs charge asset-based fees, but they generally do not charge initial sales charges or redemption fees and investors typically pay only customary brokerage fees to buy and sell ETF shares. The fees and costs charged by ETFs held in client accounts will not be deducted from the compensation the client pays Navellier. ETF prices can fluctuate up or down, and a client account could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. ETFs are subject to additional risks:
- ETF shares may trade above or below their net asset value;
- An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained;
- The value of an ETF may be more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities the ETF is designed to track;
- The cost of owning shares of the ETF may exceed those a client would incur by directly investing in the underlying securities; and
- Trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem it appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.
Grader Disclosures: Investment in equity strategies involves substantial risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. The sample portfolio and any accompanying charts are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision. As a matter of normal and important disclosures to you, as a potential investor, please consider the following: The performance presented is not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the reported performance of the A, B, C, D, and F portfolios (collectively the “model portfolios”) should be considered mere “paper” or pro forma performance results based on Navellier’s research.
Investors evaluating any of Navellier & Associates, Inc.’s, (or its affiliates’) Investment Products must not use any information presented here, including the performance figures of the model portfolios, in their evaluation of any Navellier Investment Products. Navellier Investment Products include the firm’s mutual funds and managed accounts. The model portfolios, charts, and other information presented do not represent actual funded trades and are not actual funded portfolios. There are material differences between Navellier Investment Products’ portfolios and the model portfolios, research, and performance figures presented here. The model portfolios and the research results (1) may contain stocks or ETFs that are illiquid and difficult to trade; (2) may contain stock or ETF holdings materially different from actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolios; (3) include the reinvestment of all dividends and other earnings, estimated trading costs, commissions, or management fees; and, (4) may not reflect prices obtained in an actual funded Navellier Investment Product portfolio. For these and other reasons, the reported performances of model portfolios do not reflect the performance results of Navellier’s actually funded and traded Investment Products. In most cases, Navellier’s Investment Products have materially lower performance results than the performances of the model portfolios presented.
This report contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue,” “project,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Our forward-looking statements are based on a series of expectations, assumptions, and projections, are not guarantees of future results or performance, and involve substantial risks and uncertainty as described in Form ADV Part 2A of our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is available at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by requesting a copy by emailing email@example.com. All of our forward-looking statements are as of the date of this report only. We can give no assurance that such expectations or forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially. You are urged to carefully consider all such factors.
FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are informed that, to the extent this presentation includes any federal tax advice, the presentation is not written by Navellier to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. Navellier does not advise on any income tax requirements or issues. Use of any information presented by Navellier is for general information only and does not represent tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for income tax questions and assistance.
IMPORTANT NEWSLETTER DISCLOSURE: The performance results for investment newsletters that are authored or edited by Louis Navellier, including Louis Navellier’s Growth Investor, Louis Navellier’s Breakthrough Stocks, Louis Navellier’s Accelerated Profits, and Louis Navellier’s Platinum Club, are not based on any actual securities trading, portfolio, or accounts, and the newsletters’ reported performances should be considered mere “paper” or proforma performance results. Navellier & Associates, Inc. does not have any relation to or affiliation with the owner of these newsletters. There are material differences between Navellier & Associates’ Investment Products and the InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletter portfolios authored by Louis Navellier. The InvestorPlace Media, LLC newsletters and advertising materials authored by Louis Navellier typically contain performance claims that do not include transaction costs, advisory fees, or other fees a client may incur. As a result, newsletter performance should not be used to evaluate Navellier Investment Products. The owner of the newsletters is InvestorPlace Media, LLC and any questions concerning the newsletters, including any newsletter advertising or performance claims, should be referred to InvestorPlace Media, LLC at (800) 718-8289.
Please note that Navellier & Associates and the Navellier Private Client Group are managed completely independent of the newsletters owned and published by InvestorPlace Media, LLC and written and edited by Louis Navellier, and investment performance of the newsletters should in no way be considered indicative of potential future investment performance for any Navellier & Associates separately managed account portfolio. Potential investors should consult with their financial advisor before investing in any Navellier Investment Product.
Navellier claims compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). To receive a complete list and descriptions of Navellier’s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS standards, please contact Navellier or click here. It should not be assumed that any securities recommendations made by Navellier & Associates, Inc. in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of securities made in this report.
FactSet Disclosure: Navellier does not independently calculate the statistical information included in the attached report. The calculation and the information are provided by FactSet, a company not related to Navellier. Although information contained in the report has been obtained from FactSet and is based on sources Navellier believes to be reliable, Navellier does not guarantee its accuracy, and it may be incomplete or condensed. The report and the related FactSet sourced information are provided on an “as is” basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Investors should consider the report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. The report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. FactSet sourced information is the exclusive property of FactSet. Without prior written permission of FactSet, this information may not be reproduced, disseminated or used to create any financial products. All indices are unmanaged and performance of the indices include reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment and an investment cannot be made in any index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.